From Newsgroup: alt.ham-radio.hf

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-=. MI5: bugging and counter-surveillance -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

PO: >Did. you ever look for the bugs in your house ? If not, why not ? I mean if
PO: >I thought that was happening to me, I'd search the. place from top to bottom,
PO: >I mean I live there I would know if anything was out of place. If. I was PO: >really suspicious, I would call in. one of those bug detection teams which PO: >have those machines that pick up. the transmitted radio waves. This
PO: >reminds. me of BUGS, that new programme on BBC1 on

That's. exactly what we did. We went to a competent, professional detective agency in. London, paid them over 400 quid to debug our house. They used scanner devices which go to over 1 GHz and would pick. up any nearby transmitter in that range, they also checked the phones and. found
nothing.... but if the tap was at the exchange, then they wouldn't find anything, would. they?

CS: >Doesn't this suggest to you that there are, in. fact, no bugs to be found?

You can assume that they've done this sort of thing. to other people in more "serious" cases, where they would. know the targets would suspect the
presence of electronic surveillance.. So they will have developed techniques and. devices which are not readily detectable either by visual inspection or
by electronic means. What those techniques might be, I couldn't. guess.

In this case, the existence. of bugging devices was clear from the
beginning, and. they "rubbed it in" with what was said by the boy on the
coach. It was almost as if they wanted counter-surveillance people to. be called in, who they. knew would fail to detect the bugging devices, causing loss of credibility. to the other things I would have to say relating to the harassment.

I did all the things someone in my situation would. do to try to find the bugs.. In addition to calling in professional help using electronic counter-surveillance, I made a. close visual inspection of electrical equipment, plus any points where audio or video surveillance. devices might have been concealed. Of course, I found nothing.. Normal surveillance "mini-cameras" are quite noticeable. and require visible supporting
circuitry. It. seems to me the best place to put a small video surveillance device. would be additional to a piece of electronic equipment such as a TV
or video. It would. be necessary to physically break in to a property to fit such. a device.

3217

--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2