• M I.5'P ersecution ' ho w an d why did it sta rt?

    From fvfifiv@fvfifiv@yahoo.com to alt.ham-radio.hf,alt.ham-radio.vhf-uhf,alt.security.terrorism,alt.engineering.nuclear,tw.bbs.alumni.skshs on Tue Jan 1 10:54:28 2008
    From Newsgroup: alt.ham-radio.hf

    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    -= how. and why did it start? -=
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

    The. harassment didn't start by itself, so someone must have been there at
    the outset to give it a firm push and set the "animals" after me. It. looks
    as if I was set up in June 1990,. and the timing indicates someone from university was. responsible.

    One. thing which has been missing from this discussion is this simple >prognosis: that maybe he is right. and that, despite his admitted
    mental condition, there. really is a campaign against him organised by >now-influential ex-students of his. university.

    In May or June 1990, Alan Freeman on. Radio 1 read out a letter from someone who had. known me for a few years, who wrote of the one who "wore out his welcome with random precision" (from. the Pink Floyd song). Freeman went on
    to say. to the writer "that's a hell of a letter you wrote there". The indication. is strongly that people I had parted from soon before nursed a grudge against me and were trying to cause trouble for. me.

    The suggestion is. that Freeman might have shown the letter to other people, and things could have snowballed from there. Right from the start the. real source. (security services presumed) didn't announce themselves as the
    origin, but let the "talkers", the. radio DJs, believe that they were the originators. Think about. it; if you announce, "we're MI5 and we have a campaign against this bloke" then people might not go. along with it; but if you say, "everyone else is. getting at this bloke because he 'deserves' it" then people will join. in with fewer qualms.

    Why would "they" wish to. assassinate your character?

    It's the classic case of hitting a cripple. to prove you're stronger. Why
    would the security services expend hundreds of thousands. of pounds and more than six years of. manpower to try to kill a British citizen? Because they
    are motivated. by people who knew me at university and feel personal
    animosity; because they knew me to be emotionally weak,. and it is in the nature of bullies to prey on those. known to be weak; and because they can
    rely on the complicity. of the establishment, which the security services manipulate and derive funding from. This is. England's biggest humiliation today, and the British. security services are intent on preventing their humiliation. becoming reality by continuing their campaign of attempted
    murder to suppress the truth from becoming. public.

    787

    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2