1. Forum
  2. USENET
  3. alt.ham-radio.packet

  • Test Massage

    From Tom Horne@hornetd@veriqrmzon.net to alt.ham-radio.packet on Sun Oct 7 02:01:32 2007
    From Newsgroup: alt.ham-radio.packet

    Test Massage
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From I. Care@icare@spamthis.com to alt.ham-radio.packet on Sat Oct 6 19:15:13 2007
    From Newsgroup: alt.ham-radio.packet

    In article <06XNi.2415$Cd7.459@trnddc03>, hornetd@veriqrmzon.net says...
    Test Massage

    Why not just post your actual msg. and see if it comes through? Then
    you don't have to post 2 msgs.


    Usually the NG alt.test is used for test posts so as to not clutter the
    NG's.
    --
    I. Care
    Address fake until the SPAM goes away ;-}
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Fred McKenzie@fmmck@aol.com to alt.ham-radio.packet on Mon Oct 8 19:45:29 2007
    From Newsgroup: alt.ham-radio.packet

    In article <MPG.2171e10e1a011dc2989a40@newsgroups.comcast.net>,
    I. Care <icare@spamthis.com> wrote:

    Usually the NG alt.test is used for test posts so as to not clutter the NG's.

    IC-

    Normally I would agree. However this newsgroup sees extremely little
    traffic. My news server sometimes will drop such a newsgroup due to
    lack of activity.

    I wonder if lack of activity here correlates with low activity on packet
    in general?

    Fred
    K4DII
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2