1. Forum
  2. USENET
  3. alt.ham-radio.ssb

  • lloyd_vfp@msn.com

    From n0vfp_loves_cock@n0vfp_loves_cock@yahoo.com to rec.radio.cb,rec.radio.amateur.policy,alt.ham-radio.morse,alt.ham-radio.ssb on Tue May 9 11:39:10 2006
    From Newsgroup: alt.ham-radio.ssb

    HI I'M LLOYD,

    I FUCK WITH MR MARK BECAUSE I WANT HIM INSIDE ME. I CAN'T SEEM TO ADMIT
    HOW MUCH MAN ON MAN SEX MEANS TO ME. I WANT MY ASS POUNDED. I WANT
    MARK'S LOAD DRIPPING FROM ME. I WANT SOME MAN MILK AND I WANT IT NOW.
    I'M SORRY MARKIE. FORGIVE ME THEN FUCK ME.


    lloyd_vfp@msn.com

    lloyd_vfp@msn.com








    lloyd_vfp@msn.com

    lloyd_vfp@msn.com












    lloyd_vfp@msn.com

    lloyd_vfp@msn.com



















    lloyd_vfp@msn.com

    lloyd_vfp@msn.com

    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From an_old_friend@konstans@hotmail.com to rec.radio.cb,rec.radio.amateur.policy,alt.ham-radio.morse,alt.ham-radio.ssb on Tue May 9 12:50:16 2006
    From Newsgroup: alt.ham-radio.ssb


    n0vfp_loves_cock@yahoo.com wrote:
    HI I'M LLOYD,

    I FUCK WITH MR MARK BECAUSE I WANT HIM INSIDE ME. I CAN'T SEEM TO ADMIT
    HOW MUCH MAN ON MAN SEX MEANS TO ME. I WANT MY ASS POUNDED. I WANT
    MARK'S LOAD DRIPPING FROM ME. I WANT SOME MAN MILK AND I WANT IT NOW.
    I'M SORRY MARKIE. FORGIVE ME THEN FUCK ME.
    get help wsimen

    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Big Red Ham@redballons6@yahoo.com to rec.radio.cb,rec.radio.amateur.policy,alt.ham-radio.morse,alt.ham-radio.ssb on Wed May 10 13:03:39 2006
    From Newsgroup: alt.ham-radio.ssb


    an_old_friend wrote:
    n0vfp_loves_cock@yahoo.com wrote:
    HI I'M LLOYD,

    I FUCK WITH MR MARK BECAUSE I WANT HIM INSIDE ME. I CAN'T SEEM TO ADMIT
    HOW MUCH MAN ON MAN SEX MEANS TO ME. I WANT MY ASS POUNDED. I WANT
    MARK'S LOAD DRIPPING FROM ME. I WANT SOME MAN MILK AND I WANT IT NOW.
    I'M SORRY MARKIE. FORGIVE ME THEN FUCK ME.
    get help wsimen

    more gay postings.........then they blame "an old friend" for the
    sexual shit in the groups. seems like "an old friend" only defends
    himself and it's all of you sick-fucks that start the bullshit. yep,
    you hammies use "an old friend" to cover your own sexual desires that
    you have not learned to deal with. "an old friend" does NOT spam. he
    only defends himself from the insults. code or no-code? who gives a
    fuck? i really don't..........but it sure does piss off alot of you
    idiots that code is going away. so, i hope it goes away and the written
    test becomes even easier. that is funny as hell!! the only real
    difference between ham & CB is the number of frequencies and modes
    available. Oh, and the fact that Cb'ers that become hams seem to make a
    better class of ham.

    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Norm@kb9ygd@verizon.net to rec.radio.cb,rec.radio.amateur.policy,alt.ham-radio.morse,alt.ham-radio.ssb on Thu May 11 16:55:42 2006
    From Newsgroup: alt.ham-radio.ssb

    when was the last time you worked a dx station at 50 wpm in a big pileup!
    REAL HAMS DO CW!


    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Big Red Ham@redballons6@yahoo.com to rec.radio.cb,rec.radio.amateur.policy,alt.ham-radio.morse,alt.ham-radio.ssb on Thu May 11 15:54:57 2006
    From Newsgroup: alt.ham-radio.ssb


    Norm wrote:
    when was the last time you worked a dx station at 50 wpm in a big pileup!

    REAL HAMS DO CW!

    Norm, you are truly a fucking idiot. FYI i don't play with silly hammie contests or other such non-sense. i've never sat for a "ve" exam and
    never will. i've held a general ticket since 1971 and sat before the
    fcc to be tested. actually had to draw a couple of simple circuits, not
    to mention 75% solid cpy.

    as far as 50wpm, if thats true you're using a computer to cpy. i hold
    my own at approx 25 wpm............MAYBE 30 on a good day. so what? cw
    doesn't prove shit. some of the new tech's run circles around me with
    their digital skills. you OTOH probably can't cpy your name at 5 wpm.
    to me, the new tech's are a breath of fresh air to a hobby that has
    been nothing more than a ceptic tank thanks to assholes like you.

    cb radio is still fun, too. spent many nights shooting the shit on the
    lower side of 16 with my trusty trc-48. i still like to listen to the entertainment on 38 lsb. it's funny, norm. not as funny as reading your
    horse shit, but funny.

    well, i'm leaving for s.c. .....................got to make money
    dodging the DOT fellas, don't ya know. i'll see you when i get home............you silly fucks make me laugh my ass off! thanks for
    all the material.

    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Fred@freddyr1928@ll.net to rec.radio.cb,rec.radio.amateur.policy,alt.ham-radio.morse,alt.ham-radio.ssb on Fri May 12 09:04:54 2006
    From Newsgroup: alt.ham-radio.ssb

    On 11 May 2006 15:54:57 -0700, "Big Red Ham" <redballons6@yahoo.com>
    wrote:


    Norm wrote:
    when was the last time you worked a dx station at 50 wpm in a big pileup!

    REAL HAMS DO CW!

    Norm, you are truly a fucking idiot. FYI i don't play with silly hammie >contests or other such non-sense. i've never sat for a "ve" exam and
    never will. i've held a general ticket since 1971 and sat before the
    fcc to be tested. actually had to draw a couple of simple circuits, not
    to mention 75% solid cpy.

    as far as 50wpm, if thats true you're using a computer to cpy. i hold
    my own at approx 25 wpm............MAYBE 30 on a good day. so what? cw >doesn't prove shit. some of the new tech's run circles around me with
    their digital skills. you OTOH probably can't cpy your name at 5 wpm.
    to me, the new tech's are a breath of fresh air to a hobby that has
    been nothing more than a ceptic tank thanks to assholes like you.

    cb radio is still fun, too. spent many nights shooting the shit on the
    lower side of 16 with my trusty trc-48. i still like to listen to the >entertainment on 38 lsb. it's funny, norm. not as funny as reading your
    horse shit, but funny.

    well, i'm leaving for s.c. .....................got to make money
    dodging the DOT fellas, don't ya know. i'll see you when i get >home............you silly fucks make me laugh my ass off! thanks for
    all the material.

    Word...
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Fred@freddyr1928@ll.net to rec.radio.cb,rec.radio.amateur.policy,alt.ham-radio.morse,alt.ham-radio.ssb on Sat May 13 22:14:15 2006
    From Newsgroup: alt.ham-radio.ssb

    On 10 May 2006 13:03:39 -0700, "Big Red Ham" <redballons6@yahoo.com>
    wrote:


    an_old_friend wrote:
    n0vfp_loves_cock@yahoo.com wrote:
    HI I'M LLOYD,

    I FUCK WITH MR MARK BECAUSE I WANT HIM INSIDE ME. I CAN'T SEEM TO ADMIT
    HOW MUCH MAN ON MAN SEX MEANS TO ME. I WANT MY ASS POUNDED. I WANT
    MARK'S LOAD DRIPPING FROM ME. I WANT SOME MAN MILK AND I WANT IT NOW.
    I'M SORRY MARKIE. FORGIVE ME THEN FUCK ME.
    get help wsimen

    more gay postings.........then they blame "an old friend" for the
    sexual shit in the groups. seems like "an old friend" only defends
    himself and it's all of you sick-fucks that start the bullshit. yep,
    you hammies use "an old friend" to cover your own sexual desires that
    you have not learned to deal with. "an old friend" does NOT spam. he
    only defends himself from the insults. code or no-code? who gives a
    fuck? i really don't..........but it sure does piss off alot of you
    idiots that code is going away. so, i hope it goes away and the written
    test becomes even easier. that is funny as hell!! the only real
    difference between ham & CB is the number of frequencies and modes
    available. Oh, and the fact that Cb'ers that become hams seem to make a >better class of ham.


    Your ability to reason is flawed. Does anyone that dislikes criminals
    actually desire secretly to be one? So why do you spread that old
    pro-gay propaganda? It's whole premise is flawed.
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From an_old_friend@konstans@hotmail.com to rec.radio.cb,rec.radio.amateur.policy,alt.ham-radio.morse,alt.ham-radio.ssb on Sat May 13 23:00:54 2006
    From Newsgroup: alt.ham-radio.ssb


    Fred wrote:
    On 10 May 2006 13:03:39 -0700, "Big Red Ham" <redballons6@yahoo.com>
    wrote:


    an_old_friend wrote:
    n0vfp_loves_cock@yahoo.com wrote:


    Your ability to reason is flawed.
    at least I try to reason
    Does anyone that dislikes criminals
    actually desire secretly to be one?
    no
    So why do you spread that old
    pro-gay propaganda?
    becuase you prove it is true with your every post
    It's whole premise is flawed.

    nope it is right on targetyou prove that when you isit on saying as you
    often I am spreading any progay or anti hetero agnda when you are
    insist on refusing the face the fact I am neither home nor heterosexaul
    sexaul you reveal that it is you with oretintation issues

    when you press the flase conclsuion that I must be homo or hetero you
    prove you have a sexul problem

    I am not pro homosexaul truth be told I think ture homosexals are as
    screwed up sxauly as prue hetero's, this is of properly a topic for a
    different NG, but you don't care about that

    the fact you refuse to accept what agenda I am in fact promoting is the
    proof that you have sexaul problems

    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2